Difference between revisions of "Readings"
(Tag: Visual edit) |
(→Core book) (Tag: Visual edit) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development]]: the boundary resources model. | [[Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development]]: the boundary resources model. | ||
Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173-192. | Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173-192. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
'''Complementary''' | '''Complementary''' | ||
| Line 39: | Line 35: | ||
[[The influence of developer multi-homing on competition between software ecosystems]]. | [[The influence of developer multi-homing on competition between software ecosystems]]. | ||
Journal of Systems and Software, 111, 119-127. | Journal of Systems and Software, 111, 119-127. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Rafiq, A., Ågerfalk, P. J., & Sjöström, J. (2013, June). | ||
| + | [[Boundary Resources Dependency in Third-Party Development from the Developer’s Perspective]]. | ||
| + | In International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems (pp. 197-211). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. | ||
Teixeira, J., Robles, G., & González-Barahona, J. M. (2015). | Teixeira, J., Robles, G., & González-Barahona, J. M. (2015). | ||
[[Lessons learned from applying social network analysis on an industrial Free]]/Libre/Open Source Software ecosystem. | [[Lessons learned from applying social network analysis on an industrial Free]]/Libre/Open Source Software ecosystem. | ||
Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 6(1), 1. | Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 6(1), 1. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 21:34, 7 November 2016
Core book
Tiwana, A. (2013). Platform ecosystems: aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Newnes. (Esp ch 1,2,5,6,10)
Platforms, infrastructures and ecosystems
Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239-1249. (10 pages)
Plantin, J. C., Lagoze, C., Edwards, P. N., & Sandvig, C. (2016). Infrastructure studies meet platform studies in the age of Google and Facebook. new media & society, 1461444816661553. (15 pages)
Boundary resources
Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173-192.
Complementary
Benlian, A., Hilkert, D., & Hess, T. (2015). How open is this platform? The meaning and measurement of platform openness from the complementors’ perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 30(3), 209-228.
Dal Bianco, V., Myllärniemi, V., Komssi, M., & Raatikainen, M. (2014, April). The role of platform boundary resources in software ecosystems: a case study. In Software Architecture (WICSA), 2014 IEEE/IFIP Conference on (pp. 11-20). IEEE (10 pages)
Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sorensen, C., & Yoo, Y. (2015). Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of Apple's iOS service system. MIS Quarterly, 39(1), 217-243.
Hyrynsalmi, S., Suominen, A., & Mäntymäki, M. (2016). The influence of developer multi-homing on competition between software ecosystems. Journal of Systems and Software, 111, 119-127.
A Rafiq, A., Ågerfalk, P. J., & Sjöström, J. (2013, June). Boundary Resources Dependency in Third-Party Development from the Developer’s Perspective. In International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems (pp. 197-211). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Teixeira, J., Robles, G., & González-Barahona, J. M. (2015). Lessons learned from applying social network analysis on an industrial Free/Libre/Open Source Software ecosystem. Journal of Internet Services and Applications, 6(1), 1.
