Difference between revisions of "Main Page"
From mn.ifi.proposalfailures
(Tag: Visual edit) |
(Tag: Visual edit) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Welcome to the "''learning from NFR proposal | + | == Welcome to the "''learning from NFR proposal failures''" Wiki ! == |
'''What's the point of this?''' | '''What's the point of this?''' | ||
Revision as of 12:38, 28 September 2020
Welcome to the "learning from NFR proposal failures" Wiki !
What's the point of this?
There's nothing more annoying than getting a review back that's generally favourable, with high scores, and only minor details being criticized, and then not getting the money. I suspect that NFR tends to use few reviewers per proposal, and so this becomes more of a lottery, where a minor detail giving a minus point somewhere can easily make all the difference.
Hence, a checklist of general things that one shouldn't get wrong is probably useful. Please feel free to add things to this list!
General Wiki info
