Difference between revisions of "20210430 photolitho"
From mn.fysikk.laglivlab
Dagkd@uio.no (talk | contribs) |
Dagkd@uio.no (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
** prebake on VWR plate | ** prebake on VWR plate | ||
** Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec. | ** Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec. | ||
− | ** | + | ** postbake on VWR plate |
− | |||
− | |||
* 2nd wafer | * 2nd wafer | ||
** 3100 RPM ~ 25 um | ** 3100 RPM ~ 25 um | ||
** prebake on programmable hot plate | ** prebake on programmable hot plate | ||
** Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec. | ** Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec. | ||
− | ** | + | ** Hot plate too hot, 65C postbake happened at 72-66C |
− | ** | + | ** The hot plate seems to take longer than the timer on my telephone. This needs to be checked! |
+ | ** development with PGMEA for 2:45 was too long time! Misjudged the residue and continued another 30s, then it was completely destroyed. |
Revision as of 13:32, 3 May 2021
- Started LAF-bench
- N2 valve had been left open, almost no pressure left!
- cleaned wafers with plasma only
- 1st wafer
- 3700 RPM ~ 20 um
- prebake on VWR plate
- Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec.
- postbake on VWR plate
- 2nd wafer
- 3100 RPM ~ 25 um
- prebake on programmable hot plate
- Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec.
- Hot plate too hot, 65C postbake happened at 72-66C
- The hot plate seems to take longer than the timer on my telephone. This needs to be checked!
- development with PGMEA for 2:45 was too long time! Misjudged the residue and continued another 30s, then it was completely destroyed.