Difference between revisions of "20210430 photolitho"

From mn.fysikk.laglivlab
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
** prebake on VWR plate
 
** prebake on VWR plate
 
**  Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec.
 
**  Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec.
** 10 minutes rest
+
** postbake on VWR plate
** post bake on VWR plate
 
** development with PGMEA for 2:30
 
 
* 2nd wafer  
 
* 2nd wafer  
 
** 3100 RPM ~ 25 um
 
** 3100 RPM ~ 25 um
 
** prebake on programmable hot plate
 
** prebake on programmable hot plate
 
**  Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec.
 
**  Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec.
** Postbake on programmable hotplate
+
** Hot plate too hot, 65C postbake happened at 72-66C
** Developed 2:30 min in PGMEA
+
** The hot plate seems to take longer than the timer on my telephone. This needs to be checked!
 +
** development with PGMEA for 2:45 was too long time! Misjudged the residue and continued another 30s, then it was completely destroyed.

Revision as of 13:32, 3 May 2021

  • Started LAF-bench
  • N2 valve had been left open, almost no pressure left!
  • cleaned wafers with plasma only
  • 1st wafer
    • 3700 RPM ~ 20 um
    • prebake on VWR plate
    • Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec.
    • postbake on VWR plate
  • 2nd wafer
    • 3100 RPM ~ 25 um
    • prebake on programmable hot plate
    • Masking with UV-Kub 2. UV at 11% intensity for 30 sec.
    • Hot plate too hot, 65C postbake happened at 72-66C
    • The hot plate seems to take longer than the timer on my telephone. This needs to be checked!
    • development with PGMEA for 2:45 was too long time! Misjudged the residue and continued another 30s, then it was completely destroyed.