Kick-off meeting spring semester 2022

From mn.fysikk.laglivlab
Jump to: navigation, search

Present: Kristina, Erik, Claudia, Tiril, Thomas and Dag

Plan for spring 2022

Current state of project

  • We have some microfluidic chip designs we can use although none are perfect (see examples below)
  • Protocol for fibronectin coating is established
  • Filling with cells works and cells do adhere.
  • Problems with air bubbles.
  • Finite lifetime of cells. Probably because they lack oxygen and correct CO2 level.

Goal for semester

Make a device that fulfills the following

  • Controls CO2 level
    • CO2 input can be quickly changed
    • CO2 concentration is measured
    • feedback from measurement to CO2 input
  • Cells adhere
  • Cells stay alive and divide until they are confluent
  • Splitting: partial cell release by trypsination and increased flow rate
  • Cells continue to adhere and divide after splitting
  • Possibly perform an additional experimentlike
    • migration assay by entering SDF-1/CXCL12 into a side channel
    • Ca2+ activation by flow, PBS and other changes

Write a scientific paper. Possible journals:

  • Micromachines (MDPI)
  • Sensors (MDPI)
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • Biomicrofluidics
  • Microfluidics and Nanofluidics


Specific sub-projects

CO2 measurement

In order to integrate a reliable CO2-measurement without too much development we will use the Zimmer & Peacock ISE OEM, pH sensor and software. The first challenge will be to integrate the sensor into the medium flow, either on the chip or connecting with a tube.

CO2 input change

Choice of method Some background discussion is found here.

  • Control of CO2 in media source. This can only give slow changes of CO2 concentration
  • Control of CO2 in side channel. This can yield quick CO2 changes. The side flow channel can be either
    • wet gas from gas blender
    • CO2-saturated media or CO2-concentration regulated media (no need for expensive gas blender, but extra flow control needed)
    • Choose membrane to side channel
      • PDMS: simpler to avoid gel filling step, but permeability is probably lower.
      • Gel: High permeability, more complex fabrication.

Papers on microfluidic systems with gas control for cell culture:

Robust microfluidic protocols

These protocols should be tested with and without cells.

Bubble-free operation

Here are a series of nice and practical introductions from Elveflow with lots of tips:

Defining safe flow levels for cells

How fast can the flow be without killing the cells on the way? Do tests with flow measurement. Question: how to evaluate success?

Switching of different fluids

Train on using manifolds and MUX

Gel barrier filling

Pressure or suction? How long time after cell assembly to have the right hydrophobicity?

Network with gradient generator
Network with gas flow channels separated from cell area with gel channels.