Difference between revisions of "15.03.23"
From mn.fysikk.laglivlab
(Tag: Visual edit) |
(Tag: Visual edit) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Present: Lasse, Morten, Elizabeth, Catherine | Present: Lasse, Morten, Elizabeth, Catherine | ||
| + | ==== Results (rotations per 10sec): ==== | ||
| + | Each row for a clip is a different cell. | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
!10kHz | !10kHz | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
!50MHz | !50MHz | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |0 | + | |0.25 |
| − | | | + | |3 |
| − | | | + | |3.5 |
| − | | | + | |4.25 |
| − | | | + | |3.5 |
| − | | | + | |2.75 |
| − | |0 | + | |0.25 |
| − | |0 | + | |0.25 |
| − | |0 | + | | -0.375 |
| − | |0 | + | | -0.625 |
| − | | | + | | -1 |
| − | | | + | | -1.25 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |0 | + | |0.125 |
| − | | | + | |2.25 |
| − | | | + | |2.25 |
| − | | | + | |3.25 |
| − | | | + | |3 |
| − | | | + | |2 |
| − | | | + | |1.125 |
| − | |0 | + | |0.375 |
| − | |0 | + | | -0.25 |
| − | |0 | + | | -0.625 |
| − | | | + | | -1 |
| − | | | + | | -1 |
|- | |- | ||
| − | |0 | + | |0.125 |
| − | | | + | |2 |
| − | | | + | |3 |
| − | | | + | |3 |
| − | | | + | |3 |
| − | | | + | |3.5 |
| − | |0 | + | |0.625 |
| − | |0 | + | |0.25 |
| − | |0 | + | | -0.25 |
| − | |0 | + | | -0.5 |
| − | |0 | + | | -0.75 |
| − | |0 | + | | -0.75 |
|} | |} | ||
| Line 58: | Line 60: | ||
- The rotation chamber surface is really messy, cell remains after 4-5 wash cycles with isopropanol and ultrasound bath. We should consider improving cleaning protocol, with for instance compressed air/nitrogen or something. | - The rotation chamber surface is really messy, cell remains after 4-5 wash cycles with isopropanol and ultrasound bath. We should consider improving cleaning protocol, with for instance compressed air/nitrogen or something. | ||
| + | |||
| + | - Agrees fairly well in peak amplitude and peak frequency and turning point as seen in the [[10.03.23]] experiment. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[File:BV2 Rotation 2.png|left|thumb|720x720px|The data compared to the previous BV2 WT experiment.]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:20, 21 March 2023
Present: Lasse, Morten, Elizabeth, Catherine
Results (rotations per 10sec):
Each row for a clip is a different cell.
| 10kHz | 100kHz | 200kHz | 300kHz | 500kHz | 1MHz | 5Mhz | 10MHz | 20MHz | 30MHz | 40MHz | 50MHz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | 3 | 3.5 | 4.25 | 3.5 | 2.75 | 0.25 | 0.25 | -0.375 | -0.625 | -1 | -1.25 |
| 0.125 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 3.25 | 3 | 2 | 1.125 | 0.375 | -0.25 | -0.625 | -1 | -1 |
| 0.125 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3.5 | 0.625 | 0.25 | -0.25 | -0.5 | -0.75 | -0.75 |
Observations:
- The rotation chamber surface is really messy, cell remains after 4-5 wash cycles with isopropanol and ultrasound bath. We should consider improving cleaning protocol, with for instance compressed air/nitrogen or something.
- Agrees fairly well in peak amplitude and peak frequency and turning point as seen in the 10.03.23 experiment.
