Difference between revisions of "Photolithography"
From mn.fysikk.laglivlab
Dagkd@uio.no (talk | contribs) (→Hot plate programming) (Tag: Visual edit) |
Dagkd@uio.no (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==== Preparations the day before photolithography ==== | ==== Preparations the day before photolithography ==== | ||
+ | * Open a new lab note here | ||
+ | ** Note down your desired process | ||
+ | ** As you go on the day, note all observations and final result | ||
+ | * Decide how thick layer of SU8 you need | ||
+ | * Choose right SU8 and protocol | ||
+ | ** GM1060 for layers between 5-25µm. Full datasheet | ||
+ | ** GM1070 for layers between 25-200µm. Full datasheet | ||
+ | * Find and note the following parameters: | ||
+ | ** Speed of spin-coater in rpm | ||
+ | ** Pre- and post-bake times at 65 and 95 C, t_{65}, t_{95} | ||
+ | ** Exposure dose | ||
+ | ** PGMEA development time | ||
=== Procedure notes before Nov 2023 === | === Procedure notes before Nov 2023 === |
Revision as of 15:25, 10 November 2023
Contents
Photolithography explained
SU8 process (square features)
Procedure updated Nov 2023
Handling of chemicals
Preparations the day before photolithography
- Open a new lab note here
- Note down your desired process
- As you go on the day, note all observations and final result
- Decide how thick layer of SU8 you need
- Choose right SU8 and protocol
- GM1060 for layers between 5-25µm. Full datasheet
- GM1070 for layers between 25-200µm. Full datasheet
- Find and note the following parameters:
- Speed of spin-coater in rpm
- Pre- and post-bake times at 65 and 95 C, t_{65}, t_{95}
- Exposure dose
- PGMEA development time
Procedure notes before Nov 2023
Programming various equipment
UV KUB programming
Spin coater programming
Hot plate programming
Important notes 05.03.2021
- UV doses in the tables are too large. Look at comments in Matias Busek's protocol
- The programmable hotplate is not reliable
- Two times in a row the same procedure for 25 um thick substrate with VWR and programmable hot plates gave good results for VWR hotplate but overdevelopment for programmable hotplate.
- I have observed that the programmable hotplate seems to spend too long time at each step.